Comments on: More Dan Jones Antics http://www.utahsarch.com/2006/01/more-dan-jones-antics/ Analysis, Rhetoric, Colloquy, and Heuristics on Utah Wed, 07 Dec 2011 03:46:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Travis Grant http://www.utahsarch.com/2006/01/more-dan-jones-antics/comment-page-1/#comment-592 Travis Grant Tue, 02 Feb 2010 22:37:56 +0000 http://gazelem.wordpress.com/2006/01/20/more-dan-jones-antics/#comment-592 However, where is the responsibility of the Deseret News to avoid publishing such crap in the first place. For me, it should be very high. However, the Deseret News continues to show that truth is not a value to them. However, where is the responsibility of the Deseret News to avoid publishing such crap in the first place. For me, it should be very high. However, the Deseret News continues to show that truth is not a value to them.

]]> By: David http://www.utahsarch.com/2006/01/more-dan-jones-antics/comment-page-1/#comment-591 David Tue, 02 Feb 2010 22:18:13 +0000 http://gazelem.wordpress.com/2006/01/20/more-dan-jones-antics/#comment-591 OK, just a counterpoint to consider. The Deseret News would not likely pay for a more thorough poll that would be required to really answer the question. For the level of accuracy/detail most people expect from a newspaper a poll like this is sufficient. The good news is that the question, sample size, and margin of error are all included so you can decide that it is crap. OK, just a counterpoint to consider. The Deseret News would not likely pay for a more thorough poll that would be required to really answer the question. For the level of accuracy/detail most people expect from a newspaper a poll like this is sufficient.

The good news is that the question, sample size, and margin of error are all included so you can decide that it is crap.

]]>